Commentary on Paulus and Dzindolet
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Vol. 20 (2) , 167-173
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854893020002004
Abstract
Paulus and Dzindolet (1993) presented evidence that they argued supports a two-component model of the effects of incarceration. Prison life, in their model, includes both constancy and variability, with each of these components having different effects on the individual. However, the separation of these two components at the theoretical and methodological levels is problematic. We conclude that their data can just as readily support other theoretical accounts of the effects of imprisonment without facing the difficulties posed by the two-component model.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reactions of Male and Female Inmates to Prison ConfinementCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1993
- A study of individual, environmental, and interactive effects in explaining adjustment to prisonJustice Quarterly, 1991
- Reexamining the cruel and unusual punishment of prison life.Law and Human Behavior, 1990
- Coping, Imprisonment, and RehabilitationCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1990
- Personality and crime: Knowledge destruction and construction in criminologyJustice Quarterly, 1989
- Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Coping, Behavior, and Adaptation in Prison InmatesPublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- Psychological effects of imprisonment on confined individuals.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique.Psychological Review, 1973
- Prisonization or Resocialization?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1973