Discrepant INR values: a comparison between Manchester and Thrombotest reagents using capillary and venous samples
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Laboratory Haematology
- Vol. 11 (4) , 393-398
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2257.1989.tb00238.x
Abstract
The International Sensitivity Index (ISI) for different thromboplastin reagents is obtained by calibration against WHO reference preparations. It is hoped that calculation of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) from the ISI will permit accuracy and conformity in reporting laboratory assays of warfarin effect even across a range of different techniques. We have examined the INR values of 128 warfarin patients obtained by four different techniques in common use, namely venous and capillary Thrombotest and venous and capillary Manchester reagent. Discrepant INR values were obtained. The mean Manchester venous INR values were lower than those obtained by the other three methods (P less than 0.0001). This suggests that patients dosed by reference to Manchester venous INR are liable to receive more warfarin than those dosed by the other methods.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survey of prothrombin time in National External Quality Assessment Scheme exercises (1980-87).Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1988
- Hemorrhagic Complications of Long-term Anticoagulant TherapyChest, 1986
- “Therapeutic Range” for Oral Anticoagulant TherapyChest, 1986
- Different Intensities of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in the Treatment of Proximal-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Dosage and control of oral anticoagulants: an international collaborative surveyBritish Journal of Haematology, 1982