Algorithm Combining Toxin Immunoassay and Stool Culture for Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 47 (9) , 2952-2956
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00609-09
Abstract
Enzyme immunoassays (EIA) to detect glutamate dehydrogenase or toxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB), a cytotoxicity assay, and bacteriologic culture have disadvantages when applied individually to diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections. Stool specimens ( n = 1,596) were subjected to toxin detection via an enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay (ELFA; Vidas CDAB assay) and bacteriologic culture for toxigenic C. difficile in a three-step algorithm with additional toxigenic culture. Isolates ( n = 163) from ELFA-negative stool specimens were examined via ELFA for toxin production. We amplified tcdA and tcdB from C. difficile isolates and tcdB from stool specimens that were ELFA positive or equivocal and culture negative, and we compared the results to those obtained with the three-step algorithm. More than 26% of stool specimens (419/1,596) were culture positive, yielding 248 isolates (59.2%) with both toxin genes ( tcdA - and tcdB -positive isolates), 88 isolates (21.0%) with either tcdA or tcdB , and 83 (19.8%) that had no toxin genes ( tcdA - and tcdB -negative isolates). Among 49 (culture-negative/ELFA-positive or -equivocal) stool specimens, 53.1% (26/49) represented tcdB -positive isolates. Therefore, the total number of PCR-positive cases was 362, and 27.1% (98/362) of these were detected through toxigenic culture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 63.3%, 96.7%, 90.5%, and 92.4% (ELFA alone); 92.8%, 93.3%, 80.2%, and 97.8% (culture); and 70.7%, 91.4%, 95.5%, and 100% (three-step algorithm ELFA and bacterial culture with toxigenic culture), respectively, with culture and PCR for tcdA and tcdB as the standards. Thus, sensitivity and specificity were highest using culture and ELFA, respectively, but we recommend the three-step algorithm comprising EIA to detect both toxins and toxigenic culture for C. difficile as a practical method for achieving better PPV and NPV.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Yield of Stool Culture with Isolate Toxin Testing versus a Two-Step Algorithm Including Stool Toxin Testing for Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficileJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxin: Comparison of Enzyme Immunoassay Results with Results Obtained by Cytotoxicity AssayJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Performance of TechLab C. DIFF QUIK CHEK™ and TechLab C. DIFFICILE TOX A/B II™ for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samplesDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 2007
- Effective Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a Two-Step Algorithm Including Tests for Antigen and CytotoxinJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Multiplex PCR Targetingtpi(Triose Phosphate Isomerase),tcdA(Toxin A), andtcdB(Toxin B) Genes for Toxigenic Culture ofClostridium difficileJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Distribution of Clostridium difficile variant toxinotypes and strains with binary toxin genes among clinical isolates in an American hospitalJournal of Medical Microbiology, 2004
- High Frequency of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea due to Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Clostridium difficile in a Hospital in Japan and Risk Factors for InfectionEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2003
- New Types of Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Strains among Clostridium difficile Isolates from AsiaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Isolation of a Toxin B‐Deficient Mutant Strain of Clostridium difficile in a Case of Recurrent C. difficile‐Associated DiarrheaClinical Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Results of a prospective, 18-month clinical evaluation of culture, cytotoxin testing, and culturette brand (CDT) latex testing in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrheaDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1988