The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 2. Indications for temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion.
- 1 October 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 58 (4) , 689-699
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.58.4.689
Abstract
The indication for prophylactic temporary and permanent pacing during acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by bundle branch block is high risk of progression via a Type II pattern to second or third degree (high degree) AV block during hospitalization or follow-up. In this study, determinants of high degree AV block during hospitalization and sudden death or recurrent high degree block during the first year of follow-up were examined in 432 patients with MI and bundle branch block. Timing of onset of bundle branch block, the involved fascicles, and the PR interval were examined as determinants of risk of progression to high degree AV block during MI. At highest risk were 186 patients with blocks involving the right bundle and at least one fascicle of the left bundle which were not documented on prior electrocardiograms. Risk was similar with (38%) or without (31%) accompanying first degree AV block. Patients with transient high degree AV block during MI had a 28% incidence of sudden death or recurrent high degree block during the first year of follow-up. Patients not continuously paced had a higher incidence of sudden death or recurrent high degree block than patients continuously paced (65% vs 10%, P less than 0.001). Sudden death during follow-up also occurred in 13% of patients without high degree block during MI. A subgroup with 1) documented prior MI, 2) anterior or indeterminant acute MI, and 3) no symptoms of cardiac failure had a 35% risk of sudden death. The role of permanent pacing in this group is unknown. Thus, patients at high risk of high degree AV block should receive prophylactic temporary pacing. Patients who survive high degree block with MI should receive temporary and then permanent pacing. Patients without high degree AV block during MI who nervertheless have a high risk of sudden death may benefit from permanent pacing.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 1. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up.Circulation, 1978
- Ventricular premature beats and anatomically defined coronary heart diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- Permanent pacing in patients with transient trifascicular block during acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1976
- The significance of bundle branch block during acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1975
- Long-term prognosis of patients with incomplete bilateral bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974
- Findings of prognostic value in patients with incomplete bilateral bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1973
- Immediate and Remote Prognostic Significance of Fascicular Block during Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1973
- Conduction disturbances due to anteroseptal myocardial infarction and their treatment by endocardial pacingAmerican Heart Journal, 1972
- Incomplete bilateral bundle branch block and A-V block complicating acute anterior wall myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1972
- Bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1970