Effect of massive bowel resection on enteroinsular axis.
Open Access
- 1 September 1979
- Vol. 20 (9) , 806-810
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.20.9.806
Abstract
Pancreatic endocrine function was studied in 13 patients who had undergone massive bowel resection. The patients were divided into two groups: one month after operation (short-term group), and three or more months after operation (long-term group). Oral administration of glucose caused a persistent low insulin secretion in almost all the patients and the glucose tolerance curve showed a diabetic pattern in four. In contrast, the insulin response to intravenously infused arginine was impaired in the short-term group, but was at an approximately normal level in the long-term group. Pancreatic glucagon response to intravenous arginine, however, remained unchanged in both groups. Interruption of the enteroinsular axis as the result of massive bowel resection probably plays a major part in this discrepancy of the behaviour of insulin in the long-term group.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Role of gastrointestinal hormones in the response to massive resection of the small bowel.Gut, 1977
- Localization of Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide Release by Intestinal Glucose Perfusion in ManGastroenterology, 1977
- Identification and Actions of Gastric Inhibitory PolypeptidePublished by Elsevier ,1975
- HORMONES OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACTBritish Medical Bulletin, 1974
- STIMULATION OF INSULIN SECRETION BY GASTRIC INHIBITORY POLYPEPTIDE IN MAN.1Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1973
- Changes in glucose tolerance and serum insulin following partial gastrectomy and intestinal resectionGut, 1972
- The Effects of Secretin, Pancreozymin, and Gastrin on Insulin and Glucagon Secretion in Anesthetized Dogs *Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1967
- FUNCTIONAL COMPENSATION AFTER SMALL-BOWEL RESECTION IN MANThe Lancet, 1966
- NEW INTERPRETATION OF ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCEThe Lancet, 1964
- Digestion and absorption after massive resection of the small intestine. II. Recovery of the absorptive function as shown by intestinal absorption tests in two patients and a consideration of compensatory mechanisms.1950