A comparison of symbolic and spatial filing
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
- Vol. 16 (4) , 127-130
- https://doi.org/10.1145/1165385.317479
Abstract
The traditional and still dominant form of object reference in computing systems is symbolic - data files, programs, etc. are initially labeled and subsequently referred to by name. This approach is being supplemented on some systems by a spatial alternative which is often driven by an office or desktop metaphor (e.g. Apple's Lisa and MacIntosh systems, or Bolt's 1979 Spatial Data Management System). In such systems, an object is placed in a simulated two- or three-dimensional space, and can later be retrieved by pointing to its location. In order to begin to understand the relative merits of spatial and symbolic filing schemes for representing and organizing information, we compared four ways of filing computer objects. We found location information to be of limited utility, either by itself or in combination with symbolic information. This calls into question the generality and efficacy of the desktop metaphor for information retrieval.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- How do people organize their desks?ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1983
- Human Aspects of Office Filing: Implications for the Electronic OfficeProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1982
- Remembering the location and content of sentences in a prose passage.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976
- Recall of place on the page.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972
- Incidental memory for location of information in textJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971