Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Before Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in Children
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pediatric Emergency Care
- Vol. 24 (8) , 511-515
- https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0b013e31816a8d5b
Abstract
Peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter insertion is a frequent, painful procedure that is often performed with little or no anesthesia. Current approaches that minimize pain for PIV catheter insertion have several limitations: significant delay for onset of anesthesia, inadequate anesthesia, infectious disease exposure risk from needlestick injuries, and patients' needle phobia. Comparison of the anesthetic effectiveness of J-Tip needle-free jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to the anesthetic effectiveness of topical 4% ELA-Max for PIV catheter insertion. A prospective, block-randomized, controlled trial comparing J-Tip jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to a 30-minute application of 4% ELA-Max for topical anesthesia in children 8 to 15 years old presenting to a tertiary care pediatric emergency department for PIV catheter insertion. All subjects recorded self-reported visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at time of enrollment and pain felt following PIV catheter insertion. Jet injection subjects also recorded pain of jet injection. Subjects were videotaped during jet injection and PIV catheter insertion. Videotapes were reviewed by a single blinded reviewer for observer-reported VAS pain scores for jet injection and PIV catheter insertion. Of the 70 children enrolled, 35 were randomized to the J-Tip jet injection group and 35 to the ELA-Max group. Patient-recorded enrollment VAS scores for pain were similar between groups (P = 0.74). Patient-recorded VAS scores were significantly different between groups immediately after PIV catheter insertion (17.3 for J-Tip jet injection vs 44.6 for ELA-Max, P < 0.001). Blinded reviewer assessed VAS scores for pain after PIV catheter insertion demonstrated a similar trend, but the comparison was not statistically significant (21.7 for J-Tip jet injection vs 31.9 ELA-Max, P = 0.23). J-Tip jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine provided greater anesthesia than a 30-minute application of ELA-Max according to patient self-assessment of pain for children aged 8 to 15 years undergoing PIV catheter insertion.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Buffered Lidocaine Versus ELA-Max Before Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertions in ChildrenPublished by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,2004
- The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in childrenJournal of Pediatric Nursing, 2004
- Efficacy of ethyl chloride as a local anesthetic for venipuncture and intravenous cannula insertion in a pediatric emergency departmentPediatric Emergency Care, 2001
- The Assessment and Management of Acute Pain in Infants, Children, and AdolescentsPediatrics, 2001
- Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics Reduces Pain During Intravenous Catheter Insertion in the Pediatric PatientThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2001
- Painless intravenous catheterization by intradermal jet injection of lidocaine: a randomized trialJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1999
- A risk-benefit assessment of topical percutaneous local anaesthetics in children.Drug Safety, 1997
- Prevalence and source of pain in pediatric inpatientsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1996
- Reducing pain during proceduresCurrent Opinion in Pediatrics, 1996
- Local anaesthesia with ethyl chloride freezing: problems despite proper applicationBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1991