Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 4 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 98 (8) , 1079-1087
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7555
Abstract
This randomized trial compared four treatments for varicose great saphenous veins (GSVs). Five hundred consecutive patients (580 legs) with GSV reflux were randomized to endovenous laser ablation (980 and 1470 nm, bare fibre), radiofrequency ablation, ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy or surgical stripping using tumescent local anaesthesia with light sedation. Miniphlebectomies were also performed. The patients were examined with duplex imaging before surgery, and after 3 days, 1 month and 1 year. At 1 year, seven (5·8 per cent), six (4·8 per cent), 20 (16·3 per cent) and four (4·8 per cent) of the GSVs were patent and refluxing in the laser, radiofrequency, foam and stripping groups respectively (P < 0·001). One patient developed a pulmonary embolus after foam sclerotherapy and one a deep vein thrombosis after surgical stripping. No other major complications were recorded. The mean(s.d.) postintervention pain scores (scale 0–10) were 2·58(2·41), 1·21(1·72), 1·60(2·04) and 2·25(2·23) respectively (P < 0·001). The median (range) time to return to normal function was 2 (0–25), 1 (0–30), 1 (0–30) and 4 (0–30) days respectively (P < 0·001). The time off work, corrected for weekends, was 3·6 (0–46), 2·9 (0–14), 2·9 (0–33) and 4·3 (0–42) days respectively (P < 0·001). Disease-specific quality-of-life and Short Form 36 (SF-36®) scores had improved in all groups by 1-year follow-up. In the SF-36® domains bodily pain and physical functioning, the radiofrequency and foam groups performed better in the short term than the others. All treatments were efficacious. The technical failure rate was highest after foam sclerotherapy, but both radiofrequency ablation and foam were associated with a faster recovery and less postoperative pain than endovenous laser ablation and stripping.Keywords
Funding Information
- Public Health Insurance Research Foundation of Denmark
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized clinical trial of VNUS® ClosureFAST™ radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency ablation or conventional high ligation and stripping for great saphenous varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Reduced recanalization rates of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment with increased energy dosing: Definition of a threshold for the endovenous fluence equivalentJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
- Return to Work Following Varicose Vein Surgery: Influence of Type of Operation, Employment and Social StatusEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2006
- Local Anaesthetic Flush Reduces Postoperative Pain and Haematoma Formation After Great Saphenous Vein Stripping—A Randomised Controlled TrialEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2006
- Ultrasound-guided Foam Sclerotherapy Combined with Sapheno-femoral Ligation Compared to Surgical Treatment of Varicose Veins: Early Results of a Randomised Controlled TrialEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2005
- Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statementJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2004
- Venous severity scoring: An adjunct to venous outcome assessmentJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2000
- Epidemiology of varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994