Segmentation of non-viable myocardium in delayed enhancement magnetic resonance images
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
- Vol. 21 (2-3) , 303-311
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-004-5806-z
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate six algorithms for segmenting non-viable left ventricular (LV) myocardium in delayed enhancement (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Twenty-three patients with known chronic ischemic heart disease underwent DE-MRI. DE images were first manually thresholded using an interactive region-filling tool to isolate non-viable myocardium. Then, six thresholding algorithms, based on the image intensity characteristics of either LV blood pool (BP), viable LV myocardium, or both, were applied to each image. For the Mean−2SDBP algorithm, thresholds were equal to the mean BP intensity minus twice its standard deviation. For the Mean+2SDSemi, Mean+3SDSemi, Mean+2SDAuto, and Mean+3SDAuto algorithms, thresholds equaled the mean intensity of viable myocardium plus twice (or thrice, as denoted by the name) the standard deviation of intensity (subscripts denote how these values were determined: automatic or semi-automatic). For the Minimum Intensity algorithm, the threshold equaled the minimum intensity between the BP and LV myocardium mean intensities. Percent Scar was defined as the ratio of non-viable to total myocardial pixels in each image. Agreement between each algorithm and manual thresholding was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Mean Percent Scar was 25 ± 16% by manual thresholding. Five of the six algorithms demonstrated mean bias within ±3% (all except Mean+2SDAuto); however, limits of agreement (LoA) were large in general (range 12–36%). The best overall agreement was demonstrated by the Mean+2SDSemi (bias, 0%; LoA, 12%) and Mean+3SDSemi(bias, −3%; LoA, 14%) algorithms. Conclusion: On average, five of the six algorithms proved satisfactory for clinical implementation; however, in some images, manual correction of automatic results was necessary.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative assessment of myocardial scar in delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imagingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003
- Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Improvement of Regional Myocardial Function in Patients After Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2002
- Assessment of Myocardial Viability With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingCirculation, 2002
- Relation Between Gd-DTPA Contrast Enhancement and Regional Inotropic Response in the Periphery and Center of Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2001
- The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Identify Reversible Myocardial DysfunctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at riskJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Microvascular Obstruction and Left Ventricular Remodeling Early After Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2000
- Analysis of First-Pass and Delayed Contrast-Enhancement Patterns of Dysfunctional Myocardium on MR ImagingAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2000
- MYOCARDIAL VIABILITYRadiologic Clinics of North America, 1999
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986