Using Journal Impact Factors to Correct for the Publication Bias of Medical Studies
- 26 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Biometrics
- Vol. 62 (3) , 785-792
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00513.x
Abstract
Summary Publication bias of the results of medical studies can invalidate evidence-based medicine. The existing methodology for modeling this essentially relies upon the symmetry of the funnel plot. We present a new method of modeling publication bias that uses this information plus the impact factors of the publishing journals. A simple model of the publication process enables the estimation of bias-corrected intervention effects. The procedure is illustrated using a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of single-dose oral aspirin for acute pain, and results are also obtained for five other meta-analyses. The method enables the fitting of a wide range of models and is considered more flexible than other ways of compensating for publication bias. The model also provides the basis of a statistical test for the existence of publication bias. Use of the new methodology to supplement existing methods is recommended, in the context of a sensitivity analysis.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is There a “Best” Way to Detect and Minimize Publication Bias?Evaluation & the Health Professions, 2001
- Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysisBiostatistics, 2000
- A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000
- A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000
- A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academicsOmega, 2000
- Modeling Publication Selection Effects in Meta-AnalysisStatistical Science, 1992
- An Approach for Assessing Publication Bias Prior to Performing a Meta-AnalysisStatistical Science, 1992
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Selection Models and the File Drawer ProblemStatistical Science, 1988
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986