Audiologic Diagnosis of Central versus Eighth Nerve and Cochlear Auditory Impairment
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 26 (4) , 209-226
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00206098709081550
Abstract
122 subjects divided into four groups according to the site of lesion (cochlea, eighth nerve, brainstem and temporal lobe) were subjected to an audiometric test battery, including pure-tone sensitivity measures, recruitment testing, tone decay, Bekesy audiometry, speech audiometry, stapedius reflex measures and auditory brainstem response (ABR) audiometry. The results were contrasted among the four groups by calculating several measures of test performance, including sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, A'' (test performance) and plots on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space of pure positives versus false alarms. In the differential diagnosis between eighth nerve and cochlear site, the various measures did not rank the tests in the same order: (a) for efficiency: ABR, Bekesy audiometry; (b) for A'' (similarly to the analysis into the ROC space): ABR, recruitment, Bekesy, stapedius reflex, speech audiometry, tone decay. In distinguishing an eighth nerve from a brainstem site, it is important to consider amount of hearing loss, presence of tinnitus, abnormal tone decay and Bekesy audiometry patterns. ABR adds significant diagnostic efficiency only when waves II, III and V are detectable: a prolonged I-II interpeak interval (IPI) and a normal III-V IPI are characteristic of the eighth nerve site. ABR gives good diagnostic support in the intrinsic brainstem lesions by suggesting changes in the generator sites of the component waves. The audiometric diagnosis of temporal lobe lesions involving the auditory cortex still relies upon speech audiometry: tests specifically designed for this purpose by Bocca and Calearo and by Jerger - i.e. the ''sensitized sentences'' and the identification of synthetic sentences under ipsi- or contralateral competing message - are commendable for their sensitivity and efficiency in distinguishing brainstem from temporal lobe sites. In brainstem sites, the most affected ear is ipsilateral to the lesion for ABR, but contralateral for speech audiometry.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Field analysis of auditory evoked brainstem potentialsHearing Research, 1986
- A new interpretation of the generators of BAEP waves I–V: Results of a spatio-temporal dipole modelElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1985
- Evaluation of Diagnostic Audiometric TestsInternational Journal of Audiology, 1983
- Slow Cortical Responses and the Diagnosis of Central Hearing Loss in Infants and Young ChildrenInternational Journal of Audiology, 1981
- Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Electric Responses in Patients with Pontine Angle TumorsAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1980
- Diagnosis and Surgery of Acoustic TumoursActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1978
- Acoustic Tumor Detection With Brain Stem Electric Response AudiometryJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1977
- Clinical Validity of Central Auditory TestsScandinavian Audiology, 1975