Waist circumference, waist–hip ratio and body mass index and their correlation with cardiovascular disease risk factors in Australian adults
Top Cited Papers
- 27 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 254 (6) , 555-563
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2003.01229.x
Abstract
: Objectives. To compare body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and waist–hip ratio (WHR) as indices of obesity and assess the respective associations with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.Design and setting. A national sample of 11 247 Australians aged ≥25 years was examined in 2000 in a cross‐sectional survey.Main outcome measures. The examination included a fasting blood sample, standard 2‐h 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test, blood pressure measurements and questionnaires to assess treatment for dyslipidaemia and hypertension. BMI, waist circumference and WHR were measured to assess overweight and obesity.Results. The prevalence of obesity amongst Australian adults defined by BMI, waist circumference and WHR was 20.8, 30.5 and 15.8% respectively. The unadjusted odds ratio for the fourth vs. first quartile of each obesity measurement showed that WHR had the strongest relationship with type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia (women only) and hypertension. Following adjustment for age, however, there was little difference between the three measures of obesity, with the possible exceptions of hypertension in women, where BMI had a stronger association, and dyslipidaemia in women and type 2 diabetes in men, where WHR was marginally superior.Conclusions. Waist circumference, BMI and WHR identified different proportions of the population, as measured by both prevalence of obesity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Whilst WHR had the strongest correlations with CVD risk factors before adjustment for age, the three obesity measures performed similarly after adjustment for age. Given the difficulty of using age‐adjusted associations in the clinical setting, these results suggest that given appropriate cut‐off points, WHR is the most useful measure of obesity to use to identify individuals with CVD risk factors.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term and recent time trends in the prevalence of obesity among Dutch men and womenInternational Journal of Obesity, 2002
- The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)—methods and response ratesDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2002
- Association between simple anthropometric indices and cardiovascular risk factorsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2001
- Predicting intra-abdominal fatness from anthropometric measures: the influence of statureInternational Journal of Obesity, 1997
- Waist circumference reduction and cardiovascular benefits during weight loss in womenInternational Journal of Obesity, 1997
- Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sampleBMJ, 1995
- Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight managementBMJ, 1995
- Weight Gain as a Risk Factor for Clinical Diabetes Mellitus in WomenAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: Best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and womenThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- Clinical Criteria that Reflect C-Peptide Status in Idiopathic DiabetesDiabetes Care, 1983