Use of a validated delirium assessment tool improves the ability of physicians to identify delirium in medical intensive care unit patients
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 35 (12) , 2721-2724
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000292011.93074.82
Abstract
Although medical intensive care unit nurses at our institution routinely use the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) to identify delirium, physicians rely on traditional diagnostic methods. We sought to measure the effect of physicians' use of the ICDSC on their ability to detect delirium. Before-after study. Medical intensive care unit of an academic medical center. A total of 25 physicians with >or=1 month of clinical experience in the medical intensive care unit conducted 300 delirium assessments in 100 medical intensive care unit patients. Physicians sequentially evaluated two patients for delirium using whatever diagnostic method preferred. Following standardized education regarding ICDSC use, each physician evaluated two different patients for delirium using the ICDSC. Each physician assessment was preceded by consecutive, but independent, evaluations for delirium by the patient's nurse and then a validated judge using the ICDSC. Before (PRE) physician ICDSC use, the validated judge identified delirium in five patients; the physicians and nurses identified delirium in zero and four of these patients, respectively. The physicians incorrectly identified delirium in four additional patients. After (POST) physician ICDSC use, the validated judge identified delirium in 11 patients; the physicians and nurses identified delirium in eight and ten of these patients, respectively. The physicians incorrectly identified delirium in one patient. After physician ICDSC use, agreement improved between both the physicians and validated judge (PRE kappa = -0.14 [95% confidence interval {CI} = -0.27 to -0.02] to POST kappa = 0.67 [95% CI = 0.38 to 0.96]) and physicians and nurses (PRE kappa = -0.15 [95% CI = -0.29 to -0.02] to POST kappa = 0.58 [95% CI = 0.25 to 0.91]). Nurses vs. validated judge agreement was strong in both periods (PRE kappa = 0.65 [95% CI = 0.29 to 1.00] and POST kappa = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.76 to 1.00]). Use of the ICDSC, along with education supporting its use, improves the ability of physicians to detect delirium in the medical intensive care unit.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delirium assessment in the critically illIntensive Care Medicine, 2007
- CHALLENGES IN RECOGNIZING DELIRIUM: IMPACT OF SCENARIO-BASED EDUCATION ON NURSING BEDSIDE ASSESSMENT.Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Incidence, risk factors and consequences of ICU deliriumIntensive Care Medicine, 2006
- Large-scale implementation of sedation and delirium monitoring in the intensive care unit: A report from two medical centers*Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- Current opinions regarding the importance, diagnosis, and management of delirium in the intensive care unit: A survey of 912 healthcare professionals*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adultCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- Nurses' Recognition of Delirium and Its SymptomsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2001
- Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening toolIntensive Care Medicine, 2001
- Introduction of sedative, analgesic, and neuromuscular blocking agent guidelines in a medical intensive care unit: Physician and nurse adherenceCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1999