Media form and government: Democracy as an archetypal image in the electronic age
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly
- Vol. 40 (4) , 325-337
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369849
Abstract
This essay suggests that media form and government are related. From this perspective, cultural systems are defined by their dominant communication technologies which ultimately privileges some forms of government and disadvantages others. Employed as an extended example, democracy is traced through different cultural systems. The examination leads to the conclusion that participatory democracy functions as an archetypal image or ¡deal that dominates political thinking and political communication in contemporary culture. The structural features, logics, and tendencies of communication technologies explored here suggest that researchers might reasonably anticipate changes in government form and political communication.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Background television and reading performanceCommunication Monographs, 1991
- Newspapers and citizenship: Young adults’ subjective experience of newspapersCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1991
- Archetypal criticismCommunication Education, 1990
- Direct DemocracyPublished by Harvard University Press ,1989
- Multilingual language use and television exposure and preferences: The case of Belize1Communication Quarterly, 1989
- Ong's voice: “I,” the oral intellect, you, and weText and Performance Quarterly, 1989
- Class, gender, and code on prime‐time televisionCommunication Quarterly, 1989
- Text, narration, and mediaText and Performance Quarterly, 1989
- “PTL Club” viewer uses and gratificationsCommunication Quarterly, 1989
- The media reality: Epistemological functions of media in cultural systemsCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1984