Are both aspirin and heparin justified as adjuncts to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction?
- 19 June 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 341 (8860) , 1574-1578
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)90707-n
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do the Results of Randomized Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Drugs Influence Medical Practice?New England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- A randomized comparison of intravenous heparin with oral aspirin and dipyridamole 24 hours after recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. National Heart Foundation of Australia Coronary Thrombolysis Group.Circulation, 1991
- Effect of heparin on coronary arterial patency after thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- A Comparison between Heparin and Low-Dose Aspirin as Adjunctive Therapy with Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- The antiplatelet effect of daily low dose enteric-coated aspirin in man: A time course of onset and recoveryThrombosis Research, 1990
- Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- A randomized controlled trial of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and early intravenous heparin in acute myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1989
- Inhibition of thromboxane formation in vivo and ex vivo: implications for therapy with platelet inhibitory drugsBlood, 1987
- Cumulative antiplatelet effect of low‐dose enteric coated aspirinBritish Journal of Haematology, 1985
- Selective Cumulative Inhibition of Platelet Thromboxane Production by Low-dose Aspirin in Healthy SubjectsJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1982