Core Safeguards for Clinical Research with Adults Who Are Unable To Consent
- 2 October 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 135 (7) , 514-523
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-7-200110020-00011
Abstract
The National Bioethics Advisory Commission has proposed new safeguards for clinical research with adults who are unable to consent. Three other major U.S. groups have also proposed additional safeguards for this population, and existing Canadian and European guidelines already include such safeguards. While these six guidelines agree on some safeguards, they disagree on others. To allow important research to proceed while protecting adults who are unable to consent, it will be crucial to resolve these differences. This paper uses a side-by-side comparison of these six guidelines to highlight their major points of consensus, analyze their significant differences, and distill six core safeguards.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research Involving Persons with Cognitive Impairments: Results of a Survey of Alzheimer Disease Research Centers in the United StatesAlzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 2000
- EditorialBiological Psychiatry, 1999
- The Accuracy of Substituted Judgments in Patients with Terminal DiagnosesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Mentally Disabled Research SubjectsJAMA, 1996
- Myth of Substituted JudgmentArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1994
- Myth of substituted judgment. Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliableArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1994
- Proxy Decision Making for Incompetent PatientsJAMA, 1992
- Substituted Judgment: How Accurate Are Proxy Predictions?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Uncertainty in Clinical ResearchLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1988