Nestmate recognition cues in laboratory and field colonies ofSolenopsis invicta buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Chemical Ecology
- Vol. 12 (9) , 1965-1975
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01041858
Abstract
Laboratory-rearedSolenopsis invicta workers were tested for the ability to discriminate nestmates from nonnestmate conspecifics. Postcontact aggressive response to workers from local field colonies was significantly greater than the response to lab-reared workers, even when the latter were selected from colonies originating hundreds of miles away. Behavioral observations support the conclusion that lab-reared ants were less distinctive than field-collected ants with respect to recognition cues detectable on the cuticle. Potential environmental factors affecting colony odor are discussed. In addition, gas-liquid Chromatographic and statistical analyses of the majorS. invicta cuticular hydrocarbons indicate that cuticular hydrocarbon pattern was a poor predictor of laboratory colony response to field colony workers.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Male social wasps (Polistes fuscatus, hymenoptera: Vespidae) recognize their male nestmatesAnimal Behaviour, 1985
- Nestmate and Kin Recognition in Interspecific Mixed Colonies of AntsScience, 1983
- Chemical Mimicry in the Myrmecophilous BeetleMyrmecaphodius excavaticollisScience, 1982
- Cuticular hydrocarbons ofReticulitermes virginicus (Banks) and their role as potential species- and caste-recognition cuesJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1982
- Intraspecific aggression is the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosusAnimal Behaviour, 1979
- Interspecific aggression in leaf-cutting antsAnimal Behaviour, 1979
- The Insect SocietiesJournal of Animal Ecology, 1974
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IIJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964
- New Evidence of Communication in the Honeybee ColonyNature, 1952