Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination in 133 advanced soft‐tissue sarcomas: A retrospective analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 8 May 2006
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 119 (3) , 706-711
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21867
Abstract
Advanced soft‐tissue sarcomas are usually resistant to cytotoxic agents such as doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Antitumor activity has been observed for gemcitabine and docetaxel combination. We conducted a retrospective study on 133 patients (58 males/75 females) with unresectable or metastatic soft‐tissue sarcoma. The median age at diagnosis was 51.7 (18–82), with 76 patients with leiomoyosarcoma and 57 patients with other histological subtypes. The initial localizations were limb (44), uterine (32), retroperitoneal (23) and organs or bone (34). Patients received 900 mg/m2 of gemcitabine (days 1 and 8) over 90 min plus 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel (day 8), intravenously every 21 days. Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was well tolerated with an overall response of 18.4% and with no clear statistical difference between leiomyosarcomas and other histological subtypes (24.2% versus 10.4% (p = 0.06)). No difference was found between uterine soft‐tissue sarcomas versus others. The median overall survival was 12.1 months (1–28). Better overall survival was correlated with leiomyosarcoma (p = 0.01) and with the quality of the response, even for patients with stable disease (p < 10−4). No statistical difference was found for the initial localization. Response to treatment and overall survival were better for patients in World Health Organization (WHO) performance status classification (PS) 0 at baseline versus patients in WHO PS‐1, 2 or 3 (p = 0.023 and p < 10−4, respectively). Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was tolerable and demonstrated better response and survival for leiomyosarcoma, especially for patients in WHO PS‐0 at baseline. For the other histological subtypes, the response was not encouraging, but the survival for patients in response or stable suggests further investigation.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vinorelbine and low‐dose cyclophosphamide in the treatment of pediatric sarcomasCancer, 2004
- Laboratory and Clinical Evidence of Synergistic Cytotoxicity of Sequential Treament With Gemcitabine Followed by Docetaxel in the Treatment of SarcomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Phase II and Pharmacokinetic Study of Ecteinascidin 743 in Patients With Progressive Sarcomas of Soft Tissues Refractory to ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Phase II trial of gemcitabine as second-line chemotherapy of uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) StudyGynecologic Oncology, 2004
- Phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with advanced sarcomas (E1797)Cancer, 2003
- Phase II trial of gemcitabine in advanced sarcomasCancer, 2002
- Gemcitabine in advanced adult soft-tissue sarcomas. A phase II study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma GroupEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- Gemcitabine in soft tissue or bone sarcoma resistant to standard chemotherapy: a phase II studyCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2000
- Phase II Study of Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue SarcomasAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- Phase II Trial of Carboplatin in Soft-Tissue SarcomaAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990