Bridge Testing—A Surprise Every Time
- 1 May 1990
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Structural Engineering
- Vol. 116 (5) , 1370-1383
- https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1990)116:5(1370)
Abstract
Experience with field testing of highway bridges in Ontario, Canada, during recent years shows that nearly every bridge has some aspect of behavior that can escape the attention of even experienced bridge designers and analysts. This paper lists some of the various surprises encountered in bridge testing that may have a significant influence on the load‐carrying capacities of bridges. In particular, reference is made to the behavior of bridges with steel girders and concrete deck slabs, and of steel truss bridges. Lessons drawn from tests on these bridges are summarized, so they can provide an advantage in the load‐carrying capacity evaluation. It is also shown that in some cases the appearance of a bridge can be misleading with regard to its true load‐carrying capacity. In such cases, field testing is shown to be the most effective means of evaluating the bridge.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behaviour and evaluation of pin-connected steel truss bridgesCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1987
- Testing of the Manitou bridge to determine its safe load carrying capacityCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1981
- Dynamic Stresses in Continuous Plate Girder BridgesJournal of the Structural Division, 1956