Application of asymmetric statistical potentials to antibody–protein docking
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 October 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 28 (20) , 2608-2614
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts493
Abstract
Motivation: An effective docking algorithm for antibody–protein antigen complex prediction is an important first step toward design of biologics and vaccines. We have recently developed a new class of knowledge-based interaction potentials called Decoys as the Reference State (DARS) and incorporated DARS into the docking program PIPER based on the fast Fourier transform correlation approach. Although PIPER was the best performer in the latest rounds of the CAPRI protein docking experiment, it is much less accurate for docking antibody–protein antigen pairs than other types of complexes, in spite of incorporating sequence-based information on the location of the paratope. Analysis of antibody–protein antigen complexes has revealed an inherent asymmetry within these interfaces. Specifically, phenylalanine, tryptophan and tyrosine residues highly populate the paratope of the antibody but not the epitope of the antigen. Results: Since this asymmetry cannot be adequately modeled using a symmetric pairwise potential, we have removed the usual assumption of symmetry. Interaction statistics were extracted from antibody–protein complexes under the assumption that a particular atom on the antibody is different from the same atom on the antigen protein. The use of the new potential significantly improves the performance of docking for antibody–protein antigen complexes, even without any sequence information on the location of the paratope. We note that the asymmetric potential captures the effects of the multi-body interactions inherent to the complex environment in the antibody–protein antigen interface. Availability: The method is implemented in the ClusPro protein docking server, available at http://cluspro.bu.edu. Contact:midas@bu.edu or vajda@bu.edu Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: Cluspro, PIPER, SDU, and stability analysis in CAPRI rounds 13–19Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2010
- SnugDock: Paratope Structural Optimization during Antibody-Antigen Docking Compensates for Errors in Antibody Homology ModelsPLoS Computational Biology, 2010
- PIE—Efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein–protein dockingProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2009
- DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) Potentials for Protein-Protein DockingBiophysical Journal, 2008
- Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2008
- Discrimination of near‐native structures in protein–protein docking by testing the stability of local minimaProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2008
- Antibody-protein interactions: benchmark datasets and prediction tools evaluationBMC Structural Biology, 2007
- The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites 1 1Edited by A. R. FershtJournal of Molecular Biology, 1999
- Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteinsJournal of Molecular Biology, 1997
- Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct?Protein Science, 1997