The HhH(2)/NDD Domain of the Drosophila Nod Chromokinesin-like Protein Is Required for Binding to Chromosomes in the Oocyte Nucleus
Open Access
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Genetics
- Vol. 171 (4) , 1823-1835
- https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047464
Abstract
Nod is a chromokinesin-like protein that plays a critical role in segregating achiasmate chromosomes during female meiosis. The C-terminal half of the Nod protein contains two putative DNA-binding domains. The first of these domains, known as the HMGN domain, consists of three tandemly repeated high-mobility group N motifs. This domain was previously shown to be both necessary and sufficient for binding of the C-terminal half of Nod to mitotic chromosomes in embryos. The second putative DNA-binding domain, denoted HhH(2)/NDD, is a helix-hairpin-helix(2)/Nod-like DNA-binding domain. Although the HhH(2)/NDD domain is not required or sufficient for chromosome binding in embryos, several well-characterized nod mutations have been mapped in this domain. To characterize the role of the HhH(2)/NDD domain in mediating Nod function, we created a series of UAS-driven transgene constructs capable of expressing either a wild-type Nod-GFP fusion protein or proteins in which the HhH(2)/NDD domain had been altered by site-directed mutagenesis. Although wild-type Nod-GFP localizes to the oocyte chromosomes and rescues the segregation defect in nod mutant oocytes, two of three proteins carrying mutants in the HhH(2)/NDD domain fail to either rescue the nod mutant phenotype or bind to oocyte chromosomes. However, these mutant proteins do bind to the polytene chromosomes in nurse-cell nuclei and enter the oocyte nucleus. Thus, even though the HhH(2)/NDD domain is not essential for chromosome binding in other cell types, it is required for chromosome binding in the oocyte. These HhH(2)/NDD mutants also block the localization of Nod to the posterior pole of stage 9–10A oocytes, a process that is thought to facilitate the interaction of Nod with the plus ends of microtubules (Cui et al. 2005). This observation suggests that the Nod HhH2/NDD domain may play other roles in addition to binding Nod to meiotic chromosomes.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- DrosophilaNod Protein Binds Preferentially to the Plus Ends of Microtubules and Promotes Microtubule Polymerization In VitroMolecular Biology of the Cell, 2005
- The meiotic spindle of theDrosophilaoocyte: the role of Centrosomin and the central asterJournal of Cell Science, 2005
- The Second Microtubule-binding Site of Monomeric Kid Enhances the Microtubule AffinityJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2003
- The α subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase activates RNA binding by NusAGenes & Development, 2000
- Mutations in the α-Tubulin 67C Gene Specifically Impair Achiasmate Segregation in Drosophila melanogasterThe Journal of cell biology, 1999
- Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p.Genes & Development, 1996
- Identification of the chromosome localization domain of the Drosophila nod kinesin-like protein.The Journal of cell biology, 1995
- The amino acid sequence required for 5' → 3' exonuclease activity of Bacillus caldotenax DNA polymeraseProtein Engineering, Design and Selection, 1995
- Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules.The Journal of cell biology, 1990
- Genetic mapping and DNA sequence analysis of mutations in the polA gene of Escherichia coliJournal of Molecular Biology, 1985