Patterns, Mechanisms, Consequences of Variability in Settlement and Recruitment of an Intertidal Barnacle
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Monographs
- Vol. 60 (3) , 283-309
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1943059
Abstract
I examined the settlement or recruitment of the barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma at a variety of scales: temporally, over periods lasting 12 h to 1 mo, and spatially at sites separated by <1 cm to shores separated by 10 km. Both settlement and recruitment were variable at nearly all temporal and spatial scales that I examined. The majority of variability was attributable to differences in settlement or recruitment between sample periods. When only the spatial component was considered, variability decreased with scale. Large, consistent differences in settlement between geographic locations that are at approximately the same tidal height are probably the result of differential larval supply, whereas more subtle but still consistent differences in settlement between adjacent sites may, at least in part, be due to larval behavior. Differences in settlement between close sites were observed only when settlement was relatively high. This observation may be explained as follows. First, Chthamalus settle in pits or small depressions "suitable settlement sites (SSS's)" in the surface of a substrate. Second, within an SSS, space for settlement is restricted. Third, the density of SSS's differ between sites. When settlement is high, settlement differences between locations reflect differences in the number of SSS's, as all are used. However, when settlement is low, settlement will be similar between locations, since SSS's are not limiting. In a series of field experiments using both natural and artificial substrates I found that: (1) Cypris larvae of Chthamalus settled preferentially in the presence of a number of physical and biological factors. (2) Settlement was density dependent but growth and survivorship were not, which suggests exploitative but not interference intraspecific competition. (Although Chthamalus settle gregariously they space themselves out.) (3) Variability in the settlement of Chthamalus affected the ensuing adult population even at the highest settlement densities.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraspecific facilitation of larval recruitment: Gregarious settlement of the polychaete Phragmatopomacalifornica (Fewkes)Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1984
- Recruitment and metamorphosis of Haliotis larvae induced by molecules uniquely available at the surfaces of crustose red algaeJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1984
- Intertidal Zonation of Barnacles: The Influence of Planktonic Zonation of Larvae on Vertical Distribution of AdultsEcology, 1982
- Settlement patterns of Semibalanus balanoides (L.) in the Isle of Man (1977–1981)Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1982
- Fatal errors in set as a cost of dispersal and the influence of intertidal flora on set of barnaclesOecologia, 1981
- Experiments on factors influencing settlement, survival, and growth of two species of barnacles in new south walesJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1979
- Species Diversity Gradients: Synthesis of the Roles of Predation, Competition, and Temporal HeterogeneityThe American Naturalist, 1976
- The chemical basis of gregariousness in cirripedesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1962
- Effects of Competition, Predation by Thais lapillus, and Other Factors on Natural Populations of the Barnacle Balanus balanoidesEcological Monographs, 1961
- Gregariousness during settlement in the barnacle Elminius modestus DarwinJournal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 1950