Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average
- 17 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 53 (6) , 1887-1934
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00078
Abstract
People are overconfident. Overconfidence affects financial markets. How depends on who in the market is overconfident and on how information is distributed. This paper examines markets in which price‐taking traders, a strategic‐trading insider, and risk‐averse marketmakers are overconfident. Overconfidence increases expected trading volume, increases market depth, and decreases the expected utility of overconfident traders. Its effect on volatility and price quality depend on who is overconfident. Overconfident traders can cause markets to underreact to the information of rational traders. Markets also underreact to abstract, statistical, and highly relevant information, and they overreact to salient, anecdotal, and less relevant information.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 99 references indexed in Scilit:
- Information aggregation in a noisy rational expectations economyPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Aggressiveness and survival of overconfident tradersPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Noise Trading, Delegated Portfolio Management, and Economic WelfareJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- On the Mean-Variance Tradeoff in Option Replication with Transactions CostsJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996
- Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?The Journal of Finance, 1996
- Overconfidence among physicians and nurses: The ‘micro-certainty, macro-uncertainty’ phenomenonSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Facing uncertainty in the game of bridge: A calibration studyOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1987
- Probabilistic forecasting: An experiment related to the stock marketOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1972
- Overconfidence in case-study judgments.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965
- THE EFFECT OF PROBABILITY, DESIRABILITY, AND "PRIVILEGE" ON THE STATED EXPECTATIONS OF CHILDREN*Journal of Personality, 1951