Accuracy of Twelve Methods for Estimating the Real Ear Gain of Hearing Aids
- 1 February 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 8 (1) , 2-11
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198702000-00002
Abstract
The gain of a hearing aid was measured on each of eight subjects using a variety of functional (subjective) and insertion (objective) gain methods. Each measurement was repeated on subsequent days and the hearing aid gain was also determined in several couplers and on KEMAR. The multiple measurements enabled an accurate estimate of the “true” gain of the aid on each subject to be determined. The real ear gain measured by each of the individual methods was then compared with this true gain estimate and the relative accuracy of each method was quantified. Of the clinically feasible methods, probe microphone measurement of insertion gain proved to be the most accurate. Few significant differences were found between functional gain and insertion gain. Estimation of real ear gain on the basis of coupler gain appeared to be a reasonable, though not recommended approach.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Probe-Determined Hearing-Aid Gain Compared to Functional and Coupler GainsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1985
- The Reliability of Insertion Gain Measurements Using Probe Microphones in the Ear CanalScandinavian Audiology, 1984
- A Comparison of Functional Gain and 2 CM 3 Coupler GainJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1982
- Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1981