Pitch discrimination interference: The role of pitch pulse asynchrony
- 31 May 2005
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 117 (6) , 3860-3866
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1898084
Abstract
Gockel, Carlyon, and Plack [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1092–1104 (2004)] showed that discrimination of the fundamental frequency of a target tone containing only unresolved harmonics was impaired when an interfering complex tone with fixed was added to the target, but filtered into a lower frequency region. This pitch discrimination interference (PDI) was greater when the interferer contained resolved harmonics than when it contained only unresolved harmonics. Here, it is examined whether this occurred because, when the interferer contained unresolved harmonics, “pitch pulse asynchrony (PPA)” between the target and interferer provided a cue that enhanced performance; this was possible in the earlier experiment because both target and interferer had components added in sine phase. In experiment 1, it was shown that subjects were moderately sensitive to the direction of PPA across frequency regions. In experiments 2 and 3, PPA cues were eliminated by adding the components of the target only, or of both target and interferer, in random phase. For both experiments, an interferer containing resolved harmonics produced more PDI than an interferer containing unresolved harmonics. These results show that PDI is smaller for an interferer with unresolved harmonics even when cues related to PPA are eliminated.
Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Across-frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: Questioning evidence for two pitch mechanismsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004
- Phase effects in masking: Within- versus across-channel processesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003
- Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: Harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003
- Comments on “A unitary model of pitch perception” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1811–1820 (1997)]The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998
- Comparing the fundamental frequencies of resolved and unresolved harmonics: Evidence for two pitch mechanisms?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowelsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- Separation of concurrent harmonic sounds: Fundamental frequency estimation and a time-domain cancellation model of auditory processingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1993
- Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Vowels with different fundamental frequenciesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990
- An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tonesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973
- Some Parameters Influencing the Perceptibility of PitchThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1970