An unbiased correction factor for cell counts in histological sections
- 31 August 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Vol. 49 (1-2) , 133-140
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0270(93)90117-a
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A consideration of neural counting methodsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- How inaccurate is the Abercrombie correction factor for cell counts?Trends in Neurosciences, 1992
- Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cellsJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1990
- A critical evaluation of methods for estimating the numerical density of synapsesJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1986
- Neuronal death during development in the isthmo‐optic nucleus of the chick: Sustaining role of afferents from the tectumJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1985
- Snell's law: the bane of computer microscopistsJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1982
- The time of origin and the pattern of survival of neurons in the isthmo‐optic nucleus of the chickJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1976
- Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sectionsThe Anatomical Record, 1946
- Depth of Focus of Microscope ObjectivesNature, 1940
- On the number of nerve cells in the ganglion cervicale superius and of nerve fibers in the cephalic end of the truncus sympathicus in the cat and on the numerical relations of preganglionic and postganglionic neuronesJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1918