Comparing Imprecise Abundance Indices with a Symmetric Model
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Vol. 44 (4) , 793-802
- https://doi.org/10.1139/f87-097
Abstract
Richards and Schnute (1986. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 1214–1227) presented an errors-in-variables model for testing the assumption that catch per unit effort (CPUE) is an index of stock abundance. Here, I generalize the model and extend its application to any pair of abundance indices for which the ratio of variances in the two indices can be estimated. I used the model to relate density indices from two years, CPUE values from two years, and the two CPUE–density combinations. Density estimates of nearshore reef fishes from the strait of Georgia, British Columbia, were obtained by SCUBA, and CPUE estimates were obtained by angling at the same sites. Among-site differences in both CPUE and density tended to be consistent between years. For quillback rockfish (Sebastes maliger), the relationship between CPUE and density was one of strict proportionality, as found by Richards and Schute over a different depth range.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Depth and habitat distributions of three species of rockfish (Sebastes) in British Columbia: observations from the submersible PISCES IVEnvironmental Biology of Fishes, 1986
- An Experimental and Statistical Approach to the Question: Is CPUE an Index of Abundance?Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1986
- Catch-Per-Unit-Effort: A Statistical Model for Pacific Halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1985
- Using Frequency Distributions of Catch per Unit Effort to Measure Fish-Stock AbundanceTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1983
- A Versatile Growth Model with Statistically Stable ParametersCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1981