Rules of thumb for judging ecological theories
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Vol. 19 (3) , 121-126
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Model selection in ecology and evolutionTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2004
- Laws of nature and laws of ecologyOikos, 2003
- DYNAMICAL EFFECTS OF PLANT QUALITY AND PARASITISM ON POPULATION CYCLES OF LARCH BUDMOTHEcology, 2003
- SMALL-RODENT DYNAMICS AND PREDATIONEcology, 2001
- Population Cycles in Voles and Lemmings: Density Dependence and Phase Dependence in a Stochastic WorldOikos, 1999
- An Empirically Based Model for Latitudinal Gradient in Vole Population DynamicsThe American Naturalist, 1997
- How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or LessAd HocTheories will Provide More Accurate PredictionsThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1994
- Population Cycles of Mammals: Evidence for a Ratio‐Dependent Predation HypothesisEcological Monographs, 1992
- Complex Dynamics in Ecological Time SeriesEcology, 1992
- Specialist Predators, Generalist Predators, and the Microtine Rodent CycleJournal of Animal Ecology, 1991