Is cancer care best at high-volume providers?
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Oncology Reports
- Vol. 3 (5) , 404-409
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-001-0026-3
Abstract
For a variety of medical conditions and procedures, a higher volume-better outcome relationship has been hypothesized for over 25 years. An extensive, consistent body of literature supports a relationship between hospital volume and short-term outcomes for cancers treated with technologically complex surgical procedures. For cancer primarily treated by low-risk surgery, there are few studies. Recent studies found a modest (about 2%) difference in survival benefit between high-volume and low-volume providers associated with colon cancer surgery. Few evaluations in the last 15 years have addressed nonsurgical cancers, eg, lymphomas and testicular cancer. No reports have addressed recurrent or metastatic cancer. Care is better at high-volume providers for a select minority of cancers. Whether provider volume matters in the majority of cancers at the time of presentation has not been evaluated.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomySurgery, 1999
- The Relation between Volume and Outcome in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Impact of the Treating Institution on Survival of Patients With "Poor-Prognosis" Metastatic NonseminomaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- A hospital's annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rateJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1998
- Relation of Perioperative Deaths to Hospital Volume Among Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resection for MalignancyAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: true association or artefact?BMJ, 1995
- The Effects of Regionalization on Cost and Outcome for One General High-Risk Surgical ProcedureAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Management of malignant teratoma: does referral to a specialist unit matter?The Lancet, 1993
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979