On Both Sides of the Quality Bias in Price Indexes
- 1 December 2002
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
It is often argued that price indexes do not fully capture the quality improvements of new goods in the market. Because of this shortcoming, price indexes are perceived to overestimate the actual price increases that occur. In this paper, I argue that the quality bias in price indexes is just as likely to be upward as it is to be downward. I show how both the sign and the magnitude of the quality bias in the most commonly applied price index methods are determined by the cross-sectional variation of prices per quality unit across the product models sold in the market. I do so by simulating a model of a market that includes monopolistically competing suppliers of the various product models and a representative consumer with CES (constant elasticity of substitution) preferences. I illustrate the bias in the commonly applied price index methods by comparing their estimates of inflation with the theoretical inflation rate implied by the data-generating process.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hedonic RegressionsPublished by University of Chicago Press ,2003
- Exact and superlative index numbersPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Why are Semiconductor Prices Falling So Fast? Industry Estimates and Implications for Productivity MeasurementSSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
- Is Equipment Price Deflation A Statistical Artifact?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Quantifying Quality GrowthAmerican Economic Review, 2001
- Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity (May 1974)Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2001
- Exact Hedonic Price IndexesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1995
- Discrete Choice Theory of Product DifferentiationPublished by MIT Press ,1992
- The Measurement of Durable Goods PricesPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1990
- Annual Survey of General Economic Theory: The Problem of Index NumbersEconometrica, 1936