Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police
- 18 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Language in Society
- Vol. 19 (4) , 465-492
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500014779
Abstract
In this article, we examine the way citizens' descriptions of troublesome occurrences in reports to emergency dispatch personnel are vulnerable to suspicion and doubt. The vulnerability of description in these cases involves callers' categorization of, visual or aural access to, and involvement in the reported “trouble.” It is through displays of what we term practical epistemology – displays of how one has come to know about a particular event – that these vulnerabilites emerge and are tested and negotiated in the request for and dispatch of emergency assistance. (Conversation analysis, language in institutional settings, pragmatics)Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transcript Notation - Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation AnalysisAphasiology, 1999
- “I wz wondering‐uhm couldraiduhmeffect the brain permanently d'y know?”: Some observations on the intersection of speaking and writing in calls to a poison control centerWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 1989
- When Words Fail: A Single Case AnalysisSocial Problems, 1988
- Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation AnalysisSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1987
- Sequential and Institutional Contexts in Calls for HelpSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1987
- The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts: Examples from Medical EncountersSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1987
- Giving a source or basis: The practice in conversation of telling ‘how i know’Journal of Pragmatics, 1984
- Understanding Formality: The Categorization and Production of 'Formal' InteractionBritish Journal of Sociology, 1982
- A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for ConversationLanguage, 1974
- Opening up ClosingsSemiotica, 1973