Consequential Thinking and Self-Reported Delinquency in High-School Youth
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Vol. 16 (4) , 440-454
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854889016004004
Abstract
This study examined differences between high- and low-level delinquent youth in their beliefs about the legal, moral, and social consequences of deviant behavior. Male and female high-school students were classified as high and low delinquent based on their responses to a self-report measure. In general, both male and female high delinquents were significantly less likely than male and female low delinquents to rate the consequences of rule breaking (cheating on an exam) behavior as important, probable, and severe. These differences were not found in the situations involving potential violence or violence. The ways in which these findings contribute to a social-cognitive model of delinquent behavior are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issuesJustice Quarterly, 1987
- Crime, Deterrence, and Rational ChoiceAmerican Sociological Review, 1986
- Legal and Extralegal Barriers to DelinquencyCriminology, 1984
- The Development of Social Cognitive Processes among Juvenile Delinquents and Nondelinquent PeersChild Development, 1983
- Self-Reported Delinquency as an Evaluation MeasureCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1980
- Perceived Risk of Punishment and Self-Reported DelinquencySocial Forces, 1978
- Conventional Ties, Peer Influence, and the Fear of Apprehension: a Study of Adolescent Marijuana UseThe Sociological Quarterly, 1975
- Moral judgment in delinquent and nondelinquent adolescents and their mothers.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1973
- Comparison of Risk Perception between Delinquents and Non-DelinquentsThe Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1967
- Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of DelinquencyAmerican Sociological Review, 1957