AAEM minimonograph #47: Normative data in electrodiagnostic medicine
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Muscle & Nerve
Abstract
This article reviews, without mathematics, the important principles governing the acquisition and use of normative data in electrodiagnostic medicine. Common flaws in neurophysiological normative data include vague clinical criteria for establishing freedom from disease, samples that are too small and inadequately stratified, and application of Gaussian statistics to non-Gaussian variables. Other problematic issues concern the trade-off between permissible false-positivity and false-negativity in defining the limits of normative from sample data, test-retest variability, and the use of multiple independent test measurements in each electrodiagnostic examination. The following standards for normative data are proposed: (1) standardized objective determination of freedom from disease; (2) appropriately large sample of normal subjects; (3) proportional statification of normal subjects for known relevant variables; (4) test of Gaussian fit for application of Gaussian statistics; and (5) data presentation by percentiles when Gaussian fit is in doubt. Many existing normative studies in clinical neurophysiology do not meet these standards. High-quality normative data, readily accessible, is essential for the accurate electrodiagnosis of neuromuscular diseases. © 1997 American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic tests: A statistical reviewMuscle & Nerve, 1994
- Statistical errors and their effect on electrodiagnostic medicineMuscle & Nerve, 1994
- Issue & Opinions: Receiver operating characterist curve anic analysis in the prediction of carpal tunnel syndrome: A model for reporting Electrophysiological dataMuscle & Nerve, 1993
- Deriving reference values in electrodiagnostic medicineMuscle & Nerve, 1993
- Effect of statistical methodology on normal limits in nerve conduction studiesMuscle & Nerve, 1991
- AAEM minimonograph #14: The influence of temperature in clinical neurophysiologyMuscle & Nerve, 1991
- Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for MeasurementJournal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1986
- The Diagnostic Importance of the Normal FindingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Serial ulnar nerve conduction velocity measurements in normal subjects.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1969
- Biological Applications of Normal Range and Associated Significance Tests in Ignorance of Original Distribution FormsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1938