Comparison of Intranational and International Politics
- 1 June 1963
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 57 (2) , 406-419
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1952831
Abstract
The study of international relations has been considerably advanced in recent years by the application of findings from other areas of the social sciences. These have included decision-making, game theory, conflict, bargaining, communication, negotiation, systems, geography, attitudes, and simulation. International relations scholars such as Morton Kaplan, Charles McClelland, Richard C. Snyder, and Harold Sprout have built important bridges between international relations and other disciplines. It has been fortunate that such innovators have often found men from other disciplines, such as Kenneth Boulding, Harold Guetzkow, Charles Osgood, and Anatol Rapoport, in the middle of the bridge. The volumes of the Journal of Conflict Resolution offer one example of how far this remarkable effort at cross-fertilization has gone.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primitive GovernmentThe International Journal of African Historical Studies, 1980
- The relevance of the behavioral sciences to the study of international relationsBehavioral Science, 1961
- Policy-Making and Secretariat Influence in the U. N. General Assembly: The Case of Public InformationAmerican Political Science Review, 1960
- Diplomacy in the Atomic Age: Part IThe Review of Politics, 1959
- The European Parliamentary Assembly: Techniques of Emerging “Political Control”International Organization, 1959
- A Note on American Participation in Interparliamentary MeetingsInternational Organization, 1959
- The Challenge of RegionalismInternational Organization, 1958
- The place of behavioral sciences in graduate training in international relationsBehavioral Science, 1958
- The place of behavioral sciences in graduate training in international relationsBehavioral Science, 1958
- The Evolution of Diplomatic MethodThe American Historical Review, 1955