Evaluation of the Risk of a Nonrestorative Resection for the Treatment of Diverticular Disease: The Cleveland Clinic Diverticular Disease Propensity Score
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 49 (5) , 629-639
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0526-1
Abstract
The choice of operation for diverticular disease is a contentious issue, particularly in patients with acute symptoms. This study compares early outcomes between primary resection and anastomosis and Hartmann's resection and describes a propensity score for the selection of patients for nonrestorative procedures. Data were collected from 731 patients undergoing primary resection and anastomosis (Group 1) and 123 patients undergoing primary Hartmann's resection (Group 2) for diverticular disease in a single tertiary referral center from January 1981 to May 2003. Multifactorial logistic regression was used to develop a propensity score for estimating the likelihood of performing a nonrestorative procedure. Operative 30-day mortality and surgical or medical complications were 0.7 percent, 26.0 percent, and 4.8 percent for primary resection and anastomosis and 12 percent, 43.9 percent, and 14.6 percent for Hartmann's resection, respectively (P< 0.001). There was no difference in the readmission rates between primary resection and anastomosis and Hartmann's resection (7.6 percentvs.9.9 percent,P= 0.428). Laparoscopy was used for 32.7 percent of primary resection and anastomosisvs. 1.6 percent for Hartmann's resection (P< 0.001). Independentpredictors in favor for Hartmann's resection were body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 (odd's ratio = 2.32), Mannheim peritonitis index >10 (odd's ratio = 6.75), operative urgency (emergency, urgentvs.elective surgery, odd's ratio = 16.08vs.13.32), and Hinchey stage >II (odd's ratio = 27.82). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the choice of operative procedure was 93.9 percent. Although Hartmann's resection was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative adverse events, the choice of operation was dependent on the patient presentation and intra-abdominal contamination, which can be quantified in the preoperative setting by the Cleveland Clinic diverticulitis propensity score.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors affecting surgical outcome in the elderly at Auckland HospitalAnz Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Surgical Implications of ObesityAnnual Review of Medicine, 1998
- Five-year audit of the acute complications of diverticular diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1997
- Surgical management of complicated colonic diverticulitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1997
- Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patientsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Multifactorial index of preoperative risk factors in colon resectionsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1992
- Primary resection and anastomosis for treatment of acute diverticulitisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1989
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- EXPERIENCES WITH THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF DIVERTICULITIS OF THE SIGMOIDAnnals of Surgery, 1942
- LATE RESULTS IN DIVERTICULITISThe Lancet, 1938