Interlaboratory variation in a commercial bone mineral analyzer
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 141 (4) , 789-791
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.141.4.789
Abstract
Measurements of bone mineral content (BMC) were made in 14 different laboratories in the U.S. and four in Europe using commercially produced instrumentation (Norland Bone Mineral Analyzer) for 125I absorptiometry. A three-chambered standard (dipotassium hydrogen phosphate) was measured in each laboratory following their own calibration. The values of BMC in the middle range (0.6 g/cm) all were adequate (within +/- 2%), but the BMC values were underestimated by 5% or more in five laboratories for the largest chamber and in three laboratories for the smallest chamber. Width values were accurate (+/- 3%) over 0.7-1.6 cm. The effect of underestimating large values in clinical studies is to reduce the difference between normals and abnormals. Calibration error also may be responsible for the variable normal values found in the U.S. and Europe by some users of this instrument.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy of bone mineral dataAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1980
- EVALUATION OF THE MINERAL-CONTENT OF PERIPHERAL BONES (RADIUS) BY PHOTON-ABSORPTION TECHNIQUE IN NORMALS AS WELL AS IN PATIENTS WITH VARIOUS TYPES OF BONE-DISEASES1980
- Measurement of Bone Mineral in vivo: An Improved MethodScience, 1963