Clinical decision‐making by midwives: managing case Complexity

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
In making clinical judgements, it is argued that midwives use ‘shortcuts’ or heuristics based on estimated probabilities to simplify the decision-making task. Midwives (n= 30) were given simulated patient assessment situations of high and low complexity and were given simulated patient assessment situations of high and low complexity and were required to think aloud. Analysis of verbal protocols showed that subjective probability judgements (heuristics) were used more frequently in the high than low complexity case and predominated in the last quarter of the assessment period for the high complexity case. ‘Representativeness’ was identified more frequently in the high then in the low case, but was the dominant heuristic in both. Reports completed after each simulation suggest that heuristics based on memory for particular conditions affect decisions. It is concluded that midwives use heuristics, derived mainly from their clinical experiences, in an attempt to save cognitive effort and to facilitate reasonably accurate decisions-making process.

This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit: