Screening for childhood lead poisoning: a cost-minimization analysis.
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 84 (1) , 110-112
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.84.1.110
Abstract
Decision analysis was used to compare the costs of three screening strategies for childhood lead poisoning: (1) venipuncture; (2) capillary sample with venipuncture confirmation if the blood lead level is elevated; (3) stratification by risk, with venipuncture for high-risk children and capillary sample for low-risk children. Under baseline conditions, the cost of screening by the venipuncture, stratification, and capillary strategies is $22, $25, and $27, respectively. Venipuncture remains the least expensive strategy unless the cost of venipuncture is more than three times that of capillary sampling. The annual cost of a national lead screening program that uses a single venipuncture sample would be $352 million. Initial screening with a capillary sample would cost $432 million, 23% more than venipuncture.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensitivity of Erythrocyte Protoporphyrin as a Screening Test for Lead PoisoningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Setting the Optimal Erythrocyte Protoporphyrin Screening Decision Threshold for Lead Poisoning: A Decision Analytic ApproachPediatrics, 1991
- Lead Screening at Pediatric Teaching ProgramsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1989
- Decision AnalysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Association of erythrocyte protoporphyrin with blood lead level and iron status in the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1976–1980Environmental Research, 1986
- Mass screening for lead poisoning: Capillary blood sampling and automated Delves-cup atomic-absorption analysis.1974