AN INDIVIDUAL TRAVEL‐COST METHOD OF EVALUATING FOREST RECREATION
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Vol. 42 (1) , 33-42
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1991.tb00330.x
Abstract
Consumer surplus for outdoor recreation has traditionally been estimated by a Clawson‐Knetsch travel‐cost method. This paper presents zonal consumer‐surplus estimates for visitors to a number of forests and compares these estimates to those derived from individual visitor observations. Both travel‐cost procedures are used to assess the magnitude of recreational benefits and are found to produce widely different consumer‐surplus estimates. This raises questions about research methodology and has implications for the value of recreation associated with forestry and its contribution to the rate of return on forest investment.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recreational Values of ForestsForestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 1989
- A Comparison of User Benefits and Costs of Nature Conservation at Three Nature ReservesRegional Studies, 1988
- The value of changes in deer hunting quality: a travel cost approachApplied Economics, 1988
- The Necessity for Substitute Prices Recreation Demand AnalysesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1987
- The Generalized Travel Cost Model and Water Quality Benefits: A ReconsiderationSouthern Economic Journal, 1985
- An Econometric Evaluation of a Generalized Consumer Surplus Measure: The Mineral King ControversyEconometrica, 1976
- Impact of Aggregation on the Estimation of Outdoor Recreation Demand FunctionsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1973
- Estimation of Net Social Benefits from Outdoor RecreationEconometrica, 1971
- A New Approach to Consumer TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 1966
- Outdoor Recreation Demands and BenefitsLand Economics, 1963