Health-related quality of life in long-term head and neck cancer survivors: a comparison with general population norms
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 84 (2) , 149-156
- https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1576
Abstract
To examine the health-related quality of life (HRQL) in long-term head and neck (H&N) cancer survivors compared with general population norms. HRQL was assessed with three standardized questionnaires: the SF-36 Health Survey (Short Form 36) and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, -Core 30 and -Head and Neck 35 cancer module). Altogether 135 H&N cancer patients (mean age 62 years, 31% females) of 151 survivors (89% acceptance) from a longitudinal HRQL study (n = 232) were included 3 years after diagnosis. The H&N cancer patients' SF-36 scores did not differ significantly from those of an age- and sex-matched sample (n = 871) from the Swedish normative population, except on the role-physical functioning scale. On the other hand, treatment-related side-effects and disease-specific problems (e.g., swallowing, local pain and dry mouth) measured by the H&N cancer module were, with few exceptions, significantly worse than norm values. Gender comparisons revealed that female H&N cancer patients generally scored better than the norms on both the SF-36 and the EORTC QLQ-C30, while the male patients scored significantly worse on most SF-36 scales. Patients > or =65 years more often scored worse than the norm than did patients <65. Clinically relevant differences were found on the majority of SF-36 scales in comparison of tumour sites, however, comparisons of patients with small (stage I+II) versus advanced (stage III+IV) tumours revealed few differences. Three years after diagnosis H&N cancer patients still suffer significant functional limitations/problems related to their disease and its treatment but these problems do not generally affect their overall HRQL. Tumour stage no longer differentiates HRQL at 3 years, however, factors related to the patients' age, gender and location of the tumour appear to have bearing on their reported health status.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of life after laryngectomy: Are functional disabilities important?Head & Neck, 1999
- Quality‐of‐Life Effects of Psychosocial Intervention in Patients with Head and Neck CancerOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 1999
- Using reference data on quality of life—the importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3)European Journal Of Cancer, 1998
- A Prospective Quality of Life Study of Patients With Laryngeal Carcinoma by Tumor Stage and Different Radiation Therapy SchedulesThe Laryngoscope, 1998
- The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in SwedenSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- Quality of life in patients treated for head and neck cancer: A follow-up study 7 to 11 years after radiotherapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (Eortc) Questionnaire Module to be Used in Quality of Life Assessments in Head and Neck Cancer PatientsActa Oncologica, 1994
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Psychometric Validation of the Eortc Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, 30-Item Version and A Diagnosis-Specific Module for Head and Neck Cancer PatientsActa Oncologica, 1992
- Psychosocial aspects of head and neck cancer?a review of the literatureClinical Otolaryngology, 1986