Overcoming Ambivalence about American Cities
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 29 (2) , 203-229
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169302900202
Abstract
This article is addressed to urban scholars, who often have deep doubts about whether cities have a place in a more democratic and redistributive political order. Urbanists are so ambivalent about cities because many mistakenly believe that cities are, politically, inherently untrustworthy and, economically, inherently ineffectual. Rather than entering into the communitarian debate, it is more fruitful to attempt to understand how local government authority, properly conceived, is actually necessary to many left and minority goals regarding politics and economics. The lack of confidence that the left has in cities has not really been recognized or explored in the existing urban political economy literature.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Commentary and Response to "Exploring the Meaning and Implications of Deracialization in African-American Urban Politics"Urban Affairs Quarterly, 1991
- The Daniels Election in New Haven and the Failure of the Deracialization HypothesisUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1991
- The Context of Radical Populism in Us Cities: A Comparative AnalysisJournal of Urban Affairs, 1991
- The Limits of LocalismUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1990
- Type II Policy and Mandated Benefits in Economic DevelopmentUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1990
- The Burlington Community Land Trust: A Socialist Approach to Affordable Housing?Journal of Urban Affairs, 1990
- The City, the Hope of Democracy: The Casebook as Moral ActHarvard Law Review, 1990
- Law and the Possibilities for a Just Urban Political EconomyJournal of Urban Affairs, 1990
- What Is Republicanism, and Is It Worth Reviving?Harvard Law Review, 1989
- Economic Development IncentivesUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1987