Dependent Variable Reliability and Determination of Sample Size
- 1 April 1980
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 4 (2) , 253-260
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168000400211
Abstract
Arguments have recently been put forth that stan dard textbook procedures for determining the sam ple size necessary to achieve a certain level of power in a completely randomized design are incorrect when the dependent variable is fallible. In fact, however, there are several correct procedures—one of which is the standard textbook approach—be cause there are several ways of defining the magni tude of group differences. The standard formula is appropriate when group differences are defined rel ative to the within-group standard deviation of ob served scores. Advantages and disadvantages of the various approaches are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correcting "Planning an Experiment in the Company of Measurement Error"Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
- Dependent variable reliability and the power of significance tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- Planning an Experiment in the Company of Measurement ErrorApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977
- Statistical power in criterion-related validation studies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- A statistical power analysis of applied psychological research.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- DETERMINING SAMPLE SIZE FOR PLANNED AND POST HOC ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE COMPARISONS1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
- Unreliability of difference scores: A paradox for measurement of change.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- Effect of Reliability and Validity on Power of Statistical TestsSociological Methodology, 1970
- ERROR OF MEASUREMENT AND THE POWER OF A STATISTICAL TESTBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1969
- Design of experiments to maximize power relative to cost.Psychological Bulletin, 1965