Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- evidence based-public-health-policy-and-practice
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 60 (3) , 202-207
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041020
Abstract
Study objective: To analyse the contextual effect of area poverty rate on never having been screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer by (1) describing the extent of the variation in screening behaviours among 98 US metropolitan areas; (2) determining if the variation in lack of screening can be explained by differences in the characteristics of the persons who resided in these areas; and (3) determining if living in a metropolitan area with a higher poverty rate increased the likelihood of never having been screened for cancer over and above individual characteristics. Design: Cross sectional survey using data from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Multilevel logistic regression included both individual level factors as well as area poverty rate. Setting: Ninety eight areas across the USA. Participants: Over 118 000 persons residing in 98 areas; a sample aimed at estimating 48.3% of the US population age 18 or older. Main results: After adjustment for individual level factors, increasing area level poverty rate (per 5%) remained associated with never having had a mammogram (odds ratio (OR) = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 1.37); clinical breast examination (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.48), colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.19), and a faecal occult blood test (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.27). Poverty rate was not independently associated with never having had a Pap smear (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.41). The size of the variance among metropolitan or micropolitan statistical areas (MMSAs) varied by type of screening test, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 4.9% (never having had a Pap smear) to 1.2% (never having had a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy). Conclusions: Area poverty rate was independently associated with never having been screened for breast and colorectal cancer, but not cervical cancer. The size of the variance among MMSAs was modest at best.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reason for Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Absence of Screening or Detection, or Breakdown in Follow-up?JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004
- Statistical and Substantive Inferences in Public Health: Issues in the Application of Multilevel ModelsAnnual Review of Public Health, 2004
- Cancer Disparities by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic StatusCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2004
- Reliability of Information on Physical Activity and Other Chronic Disease Risk Factors among US Women Aged 40 Years or OlderAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1999
- Ability to Obtain Medical Care for the UninsuredPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States?American Journal of Public Health, 1995
- Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care: Does it Matter?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1995
- Impact of Access and Social Context on Breast Cancer Stage at DiagnosisJournal Of Health Care For The Poor and Underserved, 1995
- Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys.American Journal of Public Health, 1994
- Concordance of Self-reported Data and Medical Record Audit for Six Cancer Screening ProceduresJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993