Glycemic Control and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Optimal Hemoglobin A1c Targets. A Guidance Statement from the American College of Physicians
Open Access
- 18 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 147 (6) , 417-422
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-6-200709180-00012
Abstract
This guidance statement is derived from other organizations' guidelines and is based on an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the available guidelines. We used the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) appraisal instrument to evaluate the guidelines from various organizations. On the basis of the review of the available guidelines, we recommend: Statement 1: To prevent microvascular complications of diabetes, the goal for glycemic control should be as low as is feasible without undue risk for adverse events or an unacceptable burden on patients. Treatment goals should be based on a discussion of the benefits and harms of specific levels of glycemic control with the patient. A hemoglobin A1c level less than 7% based on individualized assessment is a reasonable goal for many but not all patients. Statement 2: The goal for hemoglobin A1c level should be based on individualized assessment of risk for complications from diabetes, comorbidity, life expectancy, and patient preferences. Statement 3: We recommend further research to assess the optimal level of glycemic control, particularly in the presence of comorbid conditions. *This paper, written by Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA; Sandeep Vijan, MD, MS; Vincenza Snow, MD; J. Thomas Cross, MD, MPH; Kevin B. Weiss, MD, MPH; and Douglas K. Owens, MD, MS, was developed for the American College of Physicians' Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee: Douglas K. Owens, MD, MS (Chair); Donald E. Casey Jr., MD, MPH, MBA; J. Thomas Cross Jr., MD, MPH; Paul Dallas, MD; Nancy C. Dolan, MD; Mary Ann Forciea, MD; Lakshmi Halasyamani, MD; Robert H. Hopkins Jr., MD; and Paul Shekelle, MD, PhD. Approved by the ACP Board of Regents on 28 October 2006.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standards of medical care in diabetes-20062006
- Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2006Diabetes Care, 2006
- Intensive Diabetes Treatment and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 1 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Guidelines for Improving the Care of the Older Person with Diabetes MellitusJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2003
- Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE projectQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: the Aace System of Intensive Diabetes Self-Management—2002 UpdateEndocrine Practice, 2002
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Lymphocytic Infundibuloneurohypophysitis as a Cause of Central Diabetes InsipidusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993