Should Patients with Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer Be Treated Differently?
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis
- Vol. 29 (Suppl. 1) , 91-97
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000054122
Abstract
Patients with malignant disease constitute a significant subgroup among patients with venous thromboembolism. Current results suggest that cancer patients are not only at an increased risk for thromboembolic events, particularly during chemotherapy treatment or after surgery, they also have an increased risk for bleeding complications while receiving oral anticoagulant treatment. The exact incidences of venous thromboembolic complications for the various types of cancer, however, are not well determined. Recent studies have indicated that subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is as safe and effective as intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Moreover, a meta-analysis has provided preliminary evidence that, compared with UFH, LMWH treatment may prolong survival in cancer patients. Initiation of LMWH treatment in these patients is, therefore, recommended. Prospective randomized clinical trials to assess the optimum dose and duration of therapy are called for.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Clinical Trial of Vena Caval Filters in the Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Proximal Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Low‐Molecular‐Weight Heparin versus Warfarin for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Randomized TrialWorld Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparins. A meta-analysisArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1995
- Double-blind randomised trial of very-low-dose warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in stage IV breast cancerThe Lancet, 1994