The role of load‐carrying in the evolution of modern body proportions
Open Access
- 21 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Anatomy
- Vol. 204 (5) , 417-430
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00295.x
Abstract
The first unquestionably bipedal early human ancestors, the species Australopithecus afarensis, were markedly different to ourselves in body proportions, having a long trunk and short legs. Some have argued that ′chimpanzee-like′ features such as these suggest a ‘bent-hip, bent-knee’ (BHBK) posture would have been adopted during gait. Computer modelling studies, however, indicate that this early human ancestor could have walked in a reasonably efficient upright posture, whereas BHBK posture would have nearly doubled the mechanical energy cost of locomotion, as it does the physiological cost of locomotion in ourselves. More modern body proportions first appear at around 1.8–1.5 Ma, with Homo ergaster (early African Homo erectus), represented by the Nariokotome skeleton KNM-WT 15000, in which the legs were considerably longer in relation to the trunk than they are in human adults, although this skeleton represents an adolescent. Several authors have suggested that this morphology would have allowed faster, more endurant walking. But during the same period, the archaeological record indicates a sharp rise in distances over which stone tools or raw materials are transported. Is this coincidental, or can load-carrying also be implicated in selection for a more modern morphology? Computer simulations of loaded walking, verified against kinetic data for humans, show that BHBK gait is even more ineffective while load-carrying. However, walking erect, the Nariokotome individual could have carried loads of 10–15% body mass for less cost, relative to body size, than AL 288-1 walking erect but unloaded. In fact, to the extent that our sample of humans is typical, KNM-WT 15000 would have had better mechanical effectiveness in bearing light loads on the back than modern human adults. Thus, selection for effectiveness in load-carrying, as well as in endurant walking, is indeed likely to have been implicated in the evolution of modern body proportions.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Size and power required for motion with implication for the evolution of early hominidsJournal of Biomechanics, 2003
- Optimum ratio of upper to lower limb lengths in hand-carrying of a load under the assumption of frequency coordinationJournal of Biomechanics, 2003
- Kariandusi: Acheulean morphology and the question of allometryAfrican Archaeological Review, 1994
- The evolution of human bipedality: ecology and functional morphologyJournal of Human Evolution, 1994
- Allometry and multidimensional form in Acheulean bifaces from Kilombe, KenyaJournal of Human Evolution, 1993
- Four legs good, two legs betterNature, 1993
- Changes in segment inertia proportions between 4 and 20 yearsJournal of Biomechanics, 1989
- Hominid footprints at laetoli: Facts and interpretationsAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1987
- Body proportions, skeletal allometry and locomotion in the hadar hominids: a reply to WolpoffJournal of Human Evolution, 1983
- The gait ofAustralopithecusAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1973