Reliability and Convergent Validity of Ideational Flexibility as a Function of Academic Achievement
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 61 (3_suppl) , 1075-1081
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1985.61.3f.1075
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that ideational flexibility shares a significant amount of variance with ideational fluency, and more importantly, that the unique variance of flexibility is unreliable and invalid in terms of inter-item and intertest correlations. However, these findings have been demonstrated only with nongifted individuals. The present study used partial-correlation procedures to evaluate the unique variance of flexibility in the divergent thinking of 230 gifted and nongifted children. Four groups (quartiles of a distribution of composite achievement test scores) were compared for reliability and convergent validity of their flexibility scores. Results confirmed there were significant differences among the four groups and that the unique variance of flexibility was only reliable and valid for the children in the quartile high in achievement.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting creativity in preadolescence from divergent thinking in early childhood.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Average correlations vs. correlated averagesBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1983
- The Effects of Scoring Formulas on the Discriminant Validity of Tests of Divergent ThinkingEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
- Quantity and Quality of Creative Thinking in Children and AdolescentsChild Development, 1978
- A Comparison of Selected Guilford and Wallach‐Kogan Creative Thinking Tests in Conjunction With Measures of Intelligence*The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1976
- THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELECTED TESTS OF CREATIVE THINKING IN A SAMPLE OF SEVENTH‐GRADE WEST AUSTRALIAN CHILDRENBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970
- Are Aptitude Tests Valid for the Highly Able?Science, 1965
- Lost: Our intelligence? Why?American Psychologist, 1964
- Continual association as a function of level of creativity and type of verbal stimulus.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964
- The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological Review, 1962