Annualized was found better than absolute risk reduction in the calculation of number needed to treat in chronic conditions
- 31 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 59 (3) , 217-223
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The number needed to treat: a useful clinical measure or a case of the Emperor's new clothes?Pharmaceutical Statistics, 2003
- Number needed to treat (NNT): estimation of a measure of clinical benefitStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Analysis of Number Needed to Treat and Cost of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Acute Coronary SyndromesPharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 1999
- Communicating the risk reduction achieved by cholesterol reducing drugsBMJ, 1998
- Cost-Minimization and the Number Needed to Treat in Uncomplicated HypertensionAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 1998
- Number needed to treat is a simple measure of treatment efficacy for cliniciansJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1996
- Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with HypercholesterolemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Mortality results in GUSTOAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological contextPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988