Resistance to extinction after varying amounts of discriminative or nondiscriminative instrumental training.
- 1 January 1962
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 64 (5) , 526-532
- https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041058
Abstract
This experiment investigated the hypothesis that acquisition level and resistance to extinction would be monotonically related for a simple (nondiscriminative) instrumental response (bar-pressing in a Skinner box), but the function would be nonmonotonic for a comparable discriminative response (successive brightness discrimination). Four groups of Ss were trained on the simple instrumental response and allowed 200, 400, 800, or 1,600 reinforced responses, 50 per day. The same numbers of reinforced responses were given to four corresponding groups of discriminatively trained Ss, the procedure employed with the latter differing only in the insertion of occasional S delta periods. All groups were exposed to one 10-min. extinction period (in the former S delta) on each of 5 successive days. Trend analyses of the data supported the initiating hypothesis; and as expected, the discriminatively trained Ss were, as a group, more resistant to extinction than the Ss trained on the simple instrumental response.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overlearning and position reversal.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- The partial reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- RESPONSE DURATION IN OPERANT LEVEL, REGULAR REINFORCEMENT, AND EXTINCTION1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961
- The effects of different amounts of training on the resistance to extinction of different patterns of partially reinforced responses.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1958
- The Effect of Partial Reinforcement and Length of Acquisition-Series upon Resistance to Extinction of a Motor and a Verbal ResponseThe American Journal of Psychology, 1956