Risk Factors for SARS Transmission from Patients Requiring Intubation: A Multicentre Investigation in Toronto, Canada
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 19 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 5 (5) , e10717
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010717
Abstract
In the 2003 Toronto SARS outbreak, SARS-CoV was transmitted in hospitals despite adherence to infection control procedures. Considerable controversy resulted regarding which procedures and behaviours were associated with the greatest risk of SARS-CoV transmission. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors for transmission of SARS-CoV during intubation from laboratory confirmed SARS patients to HCWs involved in their care. All SARS patients requiring intubation during the Toronto outbreak were identified. All HCWs who provided care to intubated SARS patients during treatment or transportation and who entered a patient room or had direct patient contact from 24 hours before to 4 hours after intubation were eligible for this study. Data was collected on patients by chart review and on HCWs by interviewer-administered questionnaire. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression models and classification and regression trees (CART) were used to identify risk factors for SARS transmission. 45 laboratory-confirmed intubated SARS patients were identified. Of the 697 HCWs involved in their care, 624 (90%) participated in the study. SARS-CoV was transmitted to 26 HCWs from 7 patients; 21 HCWs were infected by 3 patients. In multivariate GEE logistic regression models, presence in the room during fiberoptic intubation (OR = 2.79, p = .004) or ECG (OR = 3.52, p = .002), unprotected eye contact with secretions (OR = 7.34, p = .001), patient APACHE II score ≥20 (OR = 17.05, p = .009) and patient Pa02/Fi02 ratio ≤59 (OR = 8.65, p = .001) were associated with increased risk of transmission of SARS-CoV. In CART analyses, the four covariates which explained the greatest amount of variation in SARS-CoV transmission were covariates representing individual patients. Close contact with the airway of severely ill patients and failure of infection control practices to prevent exposure to respiratory secretions were associated with transmission of SARS-CoV. Rates of transmission of SARS-CoV varied widely among patients.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic reviewBMJ, 2007
- Factors Associated With Critical-Care Healthcare Workers' Adherence to Recommended Barrier Precautions During the Toronto Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome OutbreakInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2007
- Using models to identify routes of nosocomial infection: a large hospital outbreak of SARS in Hong KongProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Accuracy of Healthcare Worker Recall and Medical Record Review for Identifying Infectious Exposures to Hospitalized PatientsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2006
- Cluster of Cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Among Toronto Healthcare Workers After Implementation of Infection Control Precautions: A Case SeriesInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2006
- The SARS outbreak in a general hospital in Tianjin, China – the case of super-spreaderEpidemiology and Infection, 2005
- Patient Contact Recall after SARS ExposureEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Public Health Measures to Control the Spread of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome during the Outbreak in TorontoNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Illness in Intensive Care Staff after Brief Exposure to Severe Acute Respiratory SyndromeEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2003
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985